debian-policy Mar 2001 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

"Jürgen A. Erhard"

Crypto (Was: Re: PostgreSQL 7.1beta5 debs available) Mar 12

Nicolás Lichtmaier

Re: Package documentation Mar 03

Adrian Bunk

Bug#89807: packaging-manual still refers to /usr/doc Mar 15

Alexander Hvostov

Re: the math section should really be science Mar 11

AndreasSchulz

Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 24

Anthony Towns

Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 23
Bug#91257: PROPOSED] changes to X font policy Mar 25
Re: should vs must Mar 01
Re: Package documentation Mar 02
Re: Package documentation Mar 06
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage Mar 25
Bug#87510: PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST Mar 01
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 15
Bug#91276: make amendment Mar 26
Bug#91276: [PROPOSED 2001/03/25] update policy to match new serious severity Mar 25
Re: packages affected list for must changes to policy (was: Re: Bug#91257: [PROPOSED] changes to X font policy) Mar 28
Bug#91257: seconded, in one condition Mar 26
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage Mar 26
Re: should vs must Mar 01
Re: Package documentation Mar 06
Bug#87510: PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST Mar 01
Bug#91257: PROPOSED] changes to X font policy Mar 25
Bug#91257: seconded, in one condition Mar 26
Bug#91257: PROPOSED] changes to X font policy Mar 25
Bug#91257: seconded, in one condition Mar 26
Bug#91276: PROPOSED 2001/03/25] update policy to match new serious severity Mar 27
Re: Package documentation Mar 06
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details Mar 02
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details Mar 02
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details Mar 03
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 15
Re: packages affected list for must changes to policy (was: Re: Bug#91257: [PROPOSED] changes to X font policy) Mar 25
Re: Bug#91257: [PROPOSED] changes to X font policy Mar 25
Re: Bug#91276: PROPOSED 2001/03/25] update policy to match new serious severity Mar 27
Bug#91257: PROPOSED] changes to X font policy Mar 25
Re: packages affected list for must changes to policy (was: Re: Bug#91257: [PROPOSED] changes to X font policy) Mar 25

Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho

Re: [control] continuation lines on relation fields ? Mar 18
Re: where are valid sections defined? Mar 26
Bug#72335: ACCEPTED 31/10/2000] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules Mar 01
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details Mar 01
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details Mar 01
Re: [control] continuation lines on relation fields ? Mar 18
Bug#88249: PROPOSAL] policy process must explicitly include relevant package maintainers Mar 02
Bug#89360: Science section not listed in http://packages.debian.org/unstable/ Mar 12
Bug#90989: proposal] making all control fields multi-line Mar 25
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details Mar 01
Re: the math section should really be science Mar 13
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details Mar 01
Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile Mar 01

Arthur Korn

Bug#90287: Retraction -- my understanding of $MAIL was seriously flawed Mar 20
Re: arch: lines, for not-just-linux debian. (was Re: Hurd and architecture) Mar 31
Bug#53849: sorry for closing Mar 19
Bug#53849: Processed: your mail Mar 20
Bug#90287: [PROPOSAL] require the use of $MAIL Mar 19
Re: Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage Mar 26
Bug#90287: PROPOSAL] require the use of $MAIL Mar 22
Re: arch: lines, for not-just-linux debian. (was Re: Hurd and architecture) Mar 31

Ben Collins

Re: what are shared libs and what are not ... Mar 07
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 21
Re: Package documentation Mar 05
Bug#90511: new-proposal] (was disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 22
Re: Package documentation Mar 06
Re: what are shared libs and what are not ... Mar 07
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 22
Re: Package documentation Mar 06
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 22
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 21
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 21
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 21
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 22
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 22
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 22
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 21
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 21
Bug#90511: [proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 21
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 22
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 22
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 21
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 21

Ben Gertzfield

Bug#89473: [PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 13
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 14
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 22
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 13
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 13

Bob Hilliard

Bug#91257: seconded, in one condition Mar 26
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage Mar 25

Bradley Bell

[btb@debian.org: Re: lintian and plugins, again] Mar 28

Branden Robinson

Bug#91257: seconded, in one condition Mar 26
Bug#91257: PROPOSED] changes to X font policy Mar 25
Bug#91257: [PROPOSED] changes to X font policy Mar 25
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 23
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage Mar 25
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage Mar 25
Bug#91261: PROPOSED] modernized rewording of X/Motif policy Mar 27
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 21
Bug#91257: seconded, in one condition Mar 25
Bug#91260: PROPOSED] reclarifying the policy about X and the FHS Mar 25
Bug#87828: PROPOSAL] Deprecate confusing Build-Depends arch syntax Mar 08
Bug#91257: PROPOSED] changes to X font policy Mar 25
Bug#91252: [PROPOSED] enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy, second try Mar 25
Bug#91257: seconded, in one condition Mar 26
Bug#91260: [PROPOSED] reclarifying the policy about X and the FHS Mar 25
Bug#91257: PROPOSED] changes to X font policy Mar 25
Bug#91276: PROPOSED 2001/03/25] update policy to match new serious severity Mar 27
Re: Bug#83924: upgrading-checklist.text should mention DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS specifically Mar 08
Bug#91259: [PROPOSED] minor changes to app-defaults policy Mar 25
Bug#91261: [PROPOSED] modernized rewording of X/Motif policy Mar 25
forgot to upgrade severities Mar 27
Re: [control] continuation lines on relation fields ? Mar 18
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage Mar 25
Re: Bug#91257: [PROPOSED] changes to X font policy Mar 25
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 21
Bug#91261: PROPOSED] modernized rewording of X/Motif policy Mar 27
Re: TrueType and non-free X fonts? Mar 26
Bug#91257: seconded, in one condition Mar 26
these proposals becoming amendments Mar 25
Bug#91260: Clarification: reclarifying the policy about X and the FHS Mar 25
Bug#91249: [PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage Mar 25
Re: Bug#91276: PROPOSED 2001/03/25] update policy to match new serious severity Mar 27
Bug#91252: PROPOSED] enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy, second try Mar 31
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage Mar 25

Brian May

Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 23
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 22
Re: arch: lines, for not-just-linux debian. (was Re: Hurd and architecture) Mar 31
Bug#90287: PROPOSAL] require the use of $MAIL Mar 20
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 23
Re: Package documentation Mar 06

Brian Russo

Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 30
Bug#91252: PROPOSED] enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy, second try Mar 31
Re: the math section should really be science Mar 11
Re: arch: lines, for not-just-linux debian. (was Re: Hurd and architecture) Mar 31
Bug#91252: PROPOSED] enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy, second try Mar 31
arch: lines, for not-just-linux debian. (was Re: Hurd and architecture) Mar 30
Re: arch: lines, for not-just-linux debian. (was Re: Hurd and architecture) Mar 31
Re: the math section should really be science Mar 11

C.M. Connelly

Bug#88651: debian-policy: Section 3.2 refers to packaging manual Mar 05

Colin Watson

Bug#88788: debian-policy: Typo in copyright notice Mar 06
Re: TrueType and non-free X fonts? Mar 26
Bug#88788: debian-policy: Typo in copyright notice Mar 06
Re: Policy does not speak of translated man pages Mar 12
Re: seeking resolution to issues I have raised Mar 06
Re: architecture-specific man pages (was Re: Policy does not speak of translated man pages) Mar 27
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage Mar 25

Cyrille Chepelov

Bug#90989: [proposal] making all control fields multi-line Mar 24
Bug#90989: proposal] making all control fields multi-line Mar 25
[control] continuation lines on relation fields ? Mar 17
Re: [control] continuation lines on relation fields ? Mar 17

Debian Bug Tracking System

Processed: Proposal accepted Mar 15
Processed: your mail Mar 19
Processed: your mail Mar 19
Bug#83072: marked as done ([PROPOSED] tightening up the ban on /usr/X11R6 in packages) Mar 25
Processed: whoops Mar 22
Processed: Retraction -- my understanding of $MAIL was seriously flawed Mar 20
Bug#89807: marked as done (packaging-manual still refers to /usr/doc) Mar 15
Processed: reassign for discussion and closure Mar 07
Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details Mar 02
Processed: Mark amendment Mar 29
Processed: reassign Mar 25
Processed: 91261 becoming an amendment Mar 27
Processed: email address going away Mar 21
Bug#90511: marked as done ([proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 22
Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#89038: the informatoion in the manpage should be in policy Mar 11
Processed: make amendment Mar 26
Processed: these proposals becoming amendments Mar 25
Processed: Forgot to cc control Mar 06
Processed: forgot to upgrade severities Mar 27

debian-policy

CVS jdg: * No longer install fsstnd Mar 31

Drew Parsons

the math section should really be science Mar 11
Re: the math section should really be science Mar 13
Re: the math section should really be science Mar 14

Egon Willighagen

Re: the math section should really be science Mar 11

Frank Belew

Bug#89039: menu-policy is all but useless Mar 09

FV21FV67

Bug#78014: . Mar 20

Gerd Knorr

Bug#91261: PROPOSED] modernized rewording of X/Motif policy Mar 28

Gergely Nagy

Re: Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile Mar 01
Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile Mar 03

Gordon Sadler

Slightly OT, graphing package dependencies Mar 26

Henrique M Holschuh

Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 13
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 13
Re: Package documentation Mar 02
Bug#91276: PROPOSED 2001/03/25] update policy to match new serious severity Mar 25
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 15
Re: Package documentation Mar 02
Bug#91257: seconded, in one condition Mar 25
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 15

Herbert Xu

Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 22
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 21
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 21
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 16
Bug#89674: PROPOSAL] Clarify ldconfig usage Mar 15
Bug#89674: PROPOSAL] Clarify ldconfig usage Mar 15
Bug#88058: PROPOSAL] ftp-client virtual package Mar 01
Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 7-10 Mar 15
Bug#90511: An alternative solution to old libraries problem Mar 21
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 21
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 22
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 21
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 21
Bug#89674: PROPOSAL] Clarify ldconfig usage Mar 15
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 22
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 21

hmh

Bug#91261: seconded Mar 25
Bug#91259: seconded Mar 25
Bug#91260: seconded Mar 25

idalton

Re: seeking resolution to issues I have raised Mar 07
Re: parallel build options in source packages Mar 30

J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)

Bug#91261: PROPOSED] modernized rewording of X/Motif policy Mar 29

James Troup

Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 22

Jason Henry Parker

Re: packages affected list for must changes to policy (was: Re: Bug#91257: [PROPOSED] changes to X font policy) Mar 25

Joey Hess

Re: Bug#89637: exim_tidydb crashes Mar 15
Bug#89674: PROPOSAL] Clarify ldconfig usage Mar 15
Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile Mar 01

Josip Rodin

Re: the math section should really be science Mar 14
Re: the math section should really be science Mar 13
Bug#91260: PROPOSED] reclarifying the policy about X and the FHS Mar 25
Re: parallel build options in source packages Mar 30
Bug#91260: PROPOSED] reclarifying the policy about X and the FHS Mar 25
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage Mar 25
Re: the math section should really be science Mar 12
Re: where are valid sections defined? Mar 26
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details Mar 02
Bug#87510: PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST Mar 01
Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile Mar 01
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details Mar 03
Re: Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile Mar 03
Re: Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile Mar 01
Re: the math section should really be science Mar 11
Bug#91276: PROPOSED 2001/03/25] update policy to match new serious severity Mar 25

Julian Gilbey

Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile Mar 01
Bug#88651: debian-policy: Section 3.2 refers to packaging manual Mar 06
Bug#91252: PROPOSED] enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy, second try Mar 27
Re: the math section should really be science Mar 13
Re: should vs must Mar 02
Bug#88058: PROPOSAL] ftp-client virtual package Mar 01
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 13
Bug#91261: PROPOSED] modernized rewording of X/Motif policy Mar 27
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 13
Re: Package documentation Mar 06
Re: Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile Mar 02
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 14
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 13
Bug#89674: PROPOSAL] Clarify ldconfig usage Mar 29
Bug#72335: PROPOSAL] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules Mar 29
Bug#91276: PROPOSED 2001/03/25] update policy to match new serious severity Mar 27
Re: should vs must Mar 01
Bug#87510: PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST Mar 01
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 16
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 27
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 15
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 22
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details Mar 01
Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 7-10 Mar 15
Bug#87510: PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST Mar 01
Bug#72335: ACCEPTED 31/10/2000] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules Mar 01
Bug#86507: Progress? Mar 10
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details Mar 02
Re: should vs must Mar 01
Bug#91276: PROPOSED 2001/03/25] update policy to match new serious severity Mar 27
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details Mar 02
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 22
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage Mar 26
Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile Mar 04
Bug#90989: proposal] making all control fields multi-line Mar 27
Re: should vs must Mar 01
Bug#91276: PROPOSED 2001/03/25] update policy to match new serious severity Mar 27
Re: Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile Mar 02
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details Mar 02
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details Mar 02
Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 7-10 Mar 15
Bug#90989: proposal] making all control fields multi-line Mar 27
Bug#89674: [PROPOSAL] Clarify ldconfig usage Mar 15
Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile Mar 01
Policy rewrite: chaps 7-10 Mar 15
Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile Mar 01
Re: parallel build options in source packages Mar 29
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 15
Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile Mar 01
Bug#89674: PROPOSAL] Clarify ldconfig usage Mar 15

J�r�me Marant

Re: Policy decision about override file in debauch Mar 05
Policy decision about override file in debauch Mar 02
Re: Policy decision about override file in debauch Mar 05

Kai Henningsen

Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile Mar 03
Re: Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile Mar 03
How to do -dbg packages right? Mar 03
Re: Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile Mar 03
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details Mar 03
Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile Mar 03

Manfred Wassmann

Manoj Srivastava

Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 15
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 22
Bug#90287: PROPOSAL] require the use of $MAIL Mar 20
Bug#87711: PROPOSAL] Clarification of example configuration files Mar 22
Re: Package documentation Mar 03
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 22
Bug#53849: Processed: your mail Mar 20
Re: Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details Mar 03
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 22
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 22
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 22
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 22
Re: Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile Mar 01
Re: should vs must Mar 01

Marcelo E. Magallon

Bug#91259: PROPOSED] minor changes to app-defaults policy Mar 25
Bug#91260: PROPOSED] reclarifying the policy about X and the FHS Mar 25
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 22
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage Mar 25
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage Mar 25
Bug#91260: Clarification: reclarifying the policy about X and the FHS Mar 25

Marcus Brinkmann

Re: arch: lines, for not-just-linux debian. (was Re: Hurd and architecture) Mar 31
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 22
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 22
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 22
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 22
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 22

Martin Quinson

Policy does not speak of translated man pages Mar 12

Matt Zimmerman

Re: Where to place images? Mar 11

Oliver Elphick

Package documentation Mar 02
Re: Package documentation Mar 02
Re: PostgreSQL 7.1beta5 debs available Mar 11
Re: Package documentation Mar 02

Othmar Pasteka

what are shared libs and what are not ... Mar 07

Peter Palfrader

Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage Mar 25

Peter S Galbraith

Re: the math section should really be science Mar 12

Richard Braakman

Re: Package documentation Mar 02
Re: Package documentation Mar 03
Re: Policy decision about override file in debauch Mar 02
Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile Mar 03
Re: Package documentation Mar 06
Re: parallel build options in source packages Mar 30
Re: Policy decision about override file in debauch Mar 05
Re: parallel build options in source packages Mar 30

Robb Kidd

Bug#88788: debian-policy: Typo in copyright notice Mar 06
Bug#88788: debian-policy: Typo in copyright notice Mar 06

Roderick Schertler

Bug#83977: Don't modules need a versioned perl/perl-base dependency? Mar 08

Sam Hartman

Re: Package documentation Mar 05

Santiago Vila

Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 21
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 22
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 21
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage Mar 25

Sean 'Shaleh' Perry

Re: what are shared libs and what are not ... Mar 07
Re: seeking resolution to issues I have raised Mar 06
where are valid sections defined? Mar 26
Re: where are valid sections defined? Mar 26

Seth Arnold

Re: Package documentation Mar 06
Re: packages affected list for must changes to policy (was: Re: Bug#91257: [PROPOSED] changes to X font policy) Mar 25
packages affected list for must changes to policy (was: Re: Bug#91257: [PROPOSED] changes to X font policy) Mar 25

Steve Greenland

Re: packages affected list for must changes to policy (was: Re: Bug#91257: [PROPOSED] changes to X font policy) Mar 26
Bug#91261: PROPOSED] modernized rewording of X/Motif policy Mar 27
Bug#91261: PROPOSED] modernized rewording of X/Motif policy Mar 27
Re: Package documentation Mar 03
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 14
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 21
Bug#90511: new-proposal] (was disallow multi-distribution uploads) Mar 22
Bug#91252: PROPOSED] enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy, second try Mar 31
Re: packages affected list for must changes to policy (was: Re: Bug#91257: [PROPOSED] changes to X font policy) Mar 28
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads Mar 31

Sven LUTHER

Bug#92071: packaging manual need documentation about multi-binary packages. Mar 29

Taral

Re: parallel build options in source packages Mar 29
parallel build options in source packages Mar 29
Bug#86507: Progress? Mar 10
Re: parallel build options in source packages Mar 30
Re: parallel build options in source packages Mar 30

Tollef Fog Heen

Bug#89867: [PROPOSED] Where to place web-accessible images Mar 16
Where to place images? Mar 11

Wichert Akkerman

Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details Mar 02
Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 7-10 Mar 16
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details Mar 02
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details Mar 01
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details Mar 01
Re: [control] continuation lines on relation fields ? Mar 17
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 13
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 14
Bug#88249: [PROPOSAL] policy process must explicitly include relevant package maintainers Mar 02
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details Mar 01
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details Mar 01
Bug#90989: proposal] making all control fields multi-line Mar 25
Bug#87510: PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST Mar 01
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 13
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details Mar 02
Re: Package documentation Mar 02
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 15
Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 7-10 Mar 15
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 13
Re: Package documentation Mar 02
Re: [control] continuation lines on relation fields ? Mar 17
Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile Mar 12
Re: Policy does not speak of translated man pages Mar 12
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details Mar 01
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 15
Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 7-10 Mar 15
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50) Mar 13

Yann Dirson

Bug#53582: let's get rid of this one at last Mar 05

The last update was on 15:03 GMT Sat May 11. There are 393 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc