Bug#91276: PROPOSED 2001/03/25] update policy to match new serious severity
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 10:34:31PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Policy evidently never got updated to reflect the new "serious" severity.
> Straightforward patch follows:
>
> --- policy.sgml.old Sun Mar 25 22:33:31 2001
> +++ policy.sgml Sun Mar 25 22:33:52 2001
> @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@
> </p>
> <p>
> These classifications are roughly equivalent to the bug
> - severities <em>important</em> (for <em>must</em> or
> + severities <em>serious</em> (for <em>must</em> or
> <em>required</em> directive violations), <em>normal</em>
> (for <em>should</em> or <em>recommended</em> directive
> violations) and <em>wishlist</em> (for <em>optional</em>
Seconded.
(Why would anyone want to object to this, when it's current practice already?)
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
Reply to: