Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)

[Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>]

Previously Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> That's a good usage, but for the "old" suidregister-like behavior,
> normal SUID/SGID apps do *not* need to be dpkg-statoverride'd,
> as far as I can tell.  That's all I want to get in policy; we
> should mention that it's OK for dynamic users/groups.

What exactly do you want in policy? `if you behave like the old
suidregister don't do this' or so? I really don't see the use
of that.

Maybe someone should write a new `packaging tips and tricks'
document where things like that should go.

Wichert.

-- 
   ________________________________________________________________
 / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience  \
| wichert@cistron.nl                  http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |