Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 11:46:39AM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> retitle [PROPOSAL] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules
> thanks
>
> Previously Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > See bug#72335 (accepted).
>
> How can this be accepted if there is no record of a second in the BTS? There are a
> few `this is a good idea' remarks, but no official second (and no signed mail
> at all).
Roman and myself seconded it.
But I'm willing to follow things to the letter, write a final proposal
and go through the seconding process again. And feel free to comment.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://people.debian.org/~jdg
Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/
Reply to: