[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#91276: PROPOSED 2001/03/25] update policy to match new serious severity



On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
> --- policy.sgml.old     Sun Mar 25 22:33:31 2001
> +++ policy.sgml Sun Mar 25 22:33:52 2001
> @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@
>         </p>
>         <p>
>           These classifications are roughly equivalent to the bug
> -         severities <em>important</em> (for <em>must</em> or
> +         severities <em>serious</em> (for <em>must</em> or
>           <em>required</em> directive violations), <em>normal</em>
>           (for <em>should</em> or <em>recommended</em> directive
>           violations) and <em>wishlist</em> (for <em>optional</em>

I'd be inclined to file important bugs against "should" violations, but
since the policy changes does not forbid it...

Seconded.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh

Attachment: pgpfrXt1WWM0m.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: