[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#91249: [PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage



Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.2.0
Severity: wishlist

This proposal does not change the intended meaning of the existing policy;
it simply brings the wording of the existing policy (whose origins date
back to very early versions of the Debian Policy Manual) into line with
Policy 1.1 as more recently adopted.  I also cleaned up the wording to
reduce reiteration of policy already stated elsewhere, and hopefully made
the policy more clear.

--- policy.sgml	Sun Mar 25 01:34:33 2001
+++ policy.sgml.x-support	Sun Mar 25 01:55:07 2001
@@ -5946,14 +5946,15 @@
 	<heading>Programs for the X Window System</heading>
 
 	<p>
-	  <em>Programs that may be configured with support for the X Window
+	  <em>Programs that can be configured with support for the X Window
 	    System</em> must be configured to do so and must declare any
 	  package dependencies necessary to satisfy their runtime
-	  requirements when using the X Window System, unless the package
-	  in question is of standard or higher priority, in which case
-	  X-specific binaries may be split into a separate package, or
-	  alternative versions of the package with X support may be
-	  provided.
+	  requirements when using the X Window System.  If such a package
+	  is of higher priority than the X packages on which it depends, it
+	  is required that either the X-specific components be split into a
+	  separate package; an alternative version of the package, which
+	  includes X support, be provided; or the package's priority be
+	  lowered.
 	</p>
 
 
-- 
G. Branden Robinson            |
Debian GNU/Linux               |             If ignorance is bliss,
branden@deadbeast.net          |             is omniscience hell?
http://deadbeast.net/~branden/ |

Attachment: pgpGJIvc5JWoM.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: