[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#91261: [PROPOSED] modernized rewording of X/Motif policy



Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.2.0
Severity: wishlist

* Makes this policy cognizant of OpenMotif, which is now packaged for
  Debian.  Since OpenMotif is non-free, there is no actual policy change if
  one treats OpenMotif the same as OSF/Motif.  This proposal makes that
  explicit.

--- policy.sgml	Sun Mar 25 01:34:33 2001
+++ policy.sgml.motif	Sun Mar 25 03:41:19 2001
@@ -6205,26 +6205,29 @@
 	</p>
 
  	<p>
-	  <em>Programs that require the non-DFSG-compliant OSF/Motif
-	    library</em> should be compiled against and tested with
-	  LessTif (a free re-implementation of Motif) instead.  If the
-	  maintainer judges that the program or programs do not work
-	  sufficiently well with LessTif to be distributed and
-	  supported, but do so when compiled against Motif, then two
-	  versions of the package should be created; one linked
-	  statically against Motif and with <tt>-smotif</tt> appended
-	  to the package name, and one linked dynamically against
-	  Motif and with <tt>-dmotif</tt> appended to the package
-	  name.  Both Motif-linked versions are dependent upon
-	  non-DFSG-compliant software and thus cannot be uploaded to
-	  the main distribution; if the software is itself
-	  DFSG-compliant it may be uploaded to the contrib
-	  distribution.  While known existing versions of OSF/Motif
-	  permit unlimited redistribution of binaries linked against
-	  the library (whether statically or dynamically), it is the
-	  package maintainer's responsibility to determine whether
-	  this is permitted by the license of the copy of OSF/Motif in
-	  his or her possession.
+	  <em>Programs that require the non-DFSG-compliant OSF/Motif or
+	  OpenMotif libraries</em>
+	  <footnote>
+		OSF/Motif and OpenMotif are collectively referred to as
+		"Motif" in this policy document.
+	  </footnote>
+	  should be compiled against and tested with LessTif (a free
+	  re-implementation of Motif) instead.  If the maintainer judges
+	  that the program or programs do not work sufficiently well with
+	  LessTif to be distributed and supported, but do so when compiled
+	  against Motif, then two versions of the package should be
+	  created; one linked statically against Motif and with
+	  <tt>-smotif</tt> appended to the package name, and one linked
+	  dynamically against Motif and with <tt>-dmotif</tt> appended to
+	  the package name.  Both Motif-linked versions are dependent upon
+	  non-DFSG-compliant software and thus cannot be uploaded to the
+	  main distribution; if the software is itself DFSG-compliant it
+	  may be uploaded to the contrib distribution.  While known
+	  existing versions of Motif permit unlimited redistribution of
+	  binaries linked against the library (whether statically or
+	  dynamically), it is the package maintainer's responsibility to
+	  determine whether this is permitted by the license of the copy of
+	  Motif in his or her possession.
 	</p>
       </sect>
 

-- 
G. Branden Robinson            |     Damnit, we're all going to die; let's
Debian GNU/Linux               |     die doing something *useful*!
branden@deadbeast.net          |     -- Hal Clement, on comments that space
http://deadbeast.net/~branden/ |        exploration is dangerous

Attachment: pgpyRZhiWWwae.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: