Bug#91252: PROPOSED] enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy, second try
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 09:09:26PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 01:50:23PM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 02:22:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > + <p>To be an <tt>x-terminal-emulator</tt>, a program must:
> > > + <list>
> > > + <item>Be able to emulate a DEC VT100 terminal, or a compatible
> > > + terminal.<item>
> >
> > are there testing utilities available such that one could
> > check that something is in fact 'vt100 compatible' ?
>
> If it claims to be, that's good enough for the purposes of this policy.
> If it claims to be but actually isn't, that's a bug.
hm, probably fine
vt100 is fairly primitive, as far as terminal emulation goes anyway.
- brian.
--
Brian Russo <brusso@phys.hawaii.edu>
Debian/GNU Linux <wolfie@debian.org> http://www.debian.org
LPSG "member" <wolfie@lpsg.org> http://www.lpsg.org
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Reply to: