[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#91252: PROPOSED] enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy, second try



On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 01:50:23PM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 02:22:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > +	<p>To be an <tt>x-terminal-emulator</tt>, a program must:
> > +	<list>
> > +	  <item>Be able to emulate a DEC VT100 terminal, or a compatible
> > +		terminal.<item>
> 
> are there testing utilities available such that one could
> check that something is in fact 'vt100 compatible' ?

If it claims to be, that's good enough for the purposes of this policy.

If it claims to be but actually isn't, that's a bug.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson            |     A committee is a life form with six or
Debian GNU/Linux               |     more legs and no brain.
branden@deadbeast.net          |     -- Robert Heinlein
http://deadbeast.net/~branden/ |

Attachment: pgpHScZvCR_F2.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: