Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details

To: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>
Cc: 88111@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 11:46:39 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010302114639.B9403@cistron.nl>
Reply-to: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>, 88111@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010302094940.D1018@polya>; from J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk on Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 09:49:40AM +0000
References: <20010228230153.A11143@polya> <20010301120140.D15084@azure.humbug.org.au> <[🔎] 20010301105447.F16356@polya> <[🔎] 20010301224419.B24021@azure.humbug.org.au> <[🔎] 20010301141204.A19713@cistron.nl> <[🔎] 20010301232224.D24021@azure.humbug.org.au> <[🔎] 20010301152221.B26147@cistron.nl> <[🔎] 20010301155542.B3877@polya> <[🔎] 20010301172046.B5509@cistron.nl> <[🔎] 20010302094940.D1018@polya>

retitle [PROPOSAL] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules
thanks

Previously Julian Gilbey wrote:
> See bug#72335 (accepted).

How can this be accepted if there is no record of a second in the BTS? There are a
few `this is a good idea' remarks, but no official second (and no signed mail
at all).

Wichert.

-- 
   ________________________________________________________________
 / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience  \
| wichert@cistron.nl                  http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
  - From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>

References:
- Bug#87510: PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST
  - From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>
- Bug#87510: PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Bug#87510: PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>
- Bug#87510: PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>
- Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
  - From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>
- Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>
- Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
  - From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Next by Date: Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Previous by thread: Bug#88249: PROPOSAL] policy process must explicitly include relevant package maintainers
Next by thread: Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread