On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 09:34:01PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 11:30:08AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > > --- policy.sgml.old Sun Mar 25 22:33:31 2001 > > > +++ policy.sgml Sun Mar 25 22:33:52 2001 > > > @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ > > > </p> > > > <p> > > > These classifications are roughly equivalent to the bug > ^^^^^^^ > > > - severities <em>important</em> (for <em>must</em> or > > > + severities <em>serious</em> (for <em>must</em> or > > > <em>required</em> directive violations), <em>normal</em> > > > (for <em>should</em> or <em>recommended</em> directive > > > violations) and <em>wishlist</em> (for <em>optional</em> > > What about important severity? I would suggest the following: > > *shrug* Does it matter? I'm not worried either way. Heh, such a casual attitude is seldom in evidence when you're reading *other people's* policy proposals, especially mine... -- G. Branden Robinson | It doesn't matter what you are doing, Debian GNU/Linux | emacs is always overkill. branden@debian.org | -- Stephen J. Carpenter http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpyYyCxOUyPJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature