On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 02:12:04PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Anthony Towns wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 10:54:48AM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > > [So I guess that we stick with debian/rules MUST be makefiles as > > > well!] > > Eh? Until there's an accepted amendment to change it, yes. > Heh, when did that happen? That has never been obligatory, and I > fail to see why it should. It'll have happened during Manoj's incorporation of the packaging-manual into policy. See 72949. You'll notice you seconded it... :) Cheers, aj, who actually thought he had too, but it appears not -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.'' -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Attachment:
pgpNAcy9nFXJJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature