[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#83924: upgrading-checklist.text should mention DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS specifically



On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 09:43:00PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Ian" == Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk> writes:
> 
>  Ian> IMO the right thing to do is to always build with -g and strip
>  Ian> at `install' time (ie, when the programs are copied into the
>  Ian> debian/tmp directory, before dpkg-deb is run).
> 
> 	Why is it the right thing to do? I understand that it is the
>  easy thing to do, yes. Let us examine this in more detail. 
> 
>  a) Compile with -g
>     i) Takes more time
>    ii) Takes more disk space
>    
>       Advantage: to debug, one only needs to run the executable
>       created, since it is not stripped.

Hell yeah, and this is why I *ALWAYS* build X this way, and I will continue
to do until you pry my cold dead fingers from it.  I can always just give a
nagging bug submitter a URL to some unstripped binaries when he bitches
about a coredump.  "Oh yeah?  Do a backtrace with this unstripped binary."

That usually shuts them up pretty quick.  It's amazing how the people that
complain about segfaults can't ever be bothered to run even a single gdb
command.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson             |   Men use thought only to justify their
Debian GNU/Linux                |   wrong doings, and speech only to conceal
branden@debian.org              |   their thoughts.
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |   -- Voltaire

Attachment: pgpmjOkRLzTfx.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: