On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 04:18:55AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 07:04:53PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Certainly, having split packages would make it *easier* to cope with this,
> > and that's a good reason to make it policy, but it's not enough of a reason
> > to remove dosemu from the distribution. IMO.
> Why would dosemu need to be removed from the distribution?
Because that's what violating a "must" directive *means*. It's the sole
difference between "should" and "must": either's a bug, but if it's a
"must" the package gets dropped.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
-- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Attachment:
pgpsUEJtD7Af8.pgp
Description: PGP signature