Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 7-10
Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl> wrote:
> It should say what it currently says.
>> 7.2 Depends: should also mention "or if it is required by the
>> postinst, prerm or postrm scripts".
> Remove postrm from there, that can't rely on the Depends being present.
Is this just "postrm purge" or all invocations of postrm? If the latter,
then surely some forms of prerm can't assume dependencies either?
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Reply to: