debian-policy Jan 2000 by subject
|
[previous page]
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[next page]
|
|
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
[RFD]: Question regarding actions to take on --purge of a package.
[sarnold@willamette.edu: Re: Bug#55048: [PROPOSAL] clarify update-rc.d stuff]
Ban undocumented(7) for native packages?
Bug#39299: marked as done ([AMENDED PROPOSAL] Permit use of bz2 for source packages)
Bug#51879: Two seconds, for #53759 and #51879. [hopefully i've gpg signed this correctly]
Bug#53755: Seconded: Branden's X Proposals
Bug#53755: Seconds
Bug#53756: PROPOSED] additions to virtual package list
Re: Bug#53758: [PROPOSED] Policy for "x-window-manager" virtual package and alternative
Bug#53758: PROPOSED] Policy for "x-window-manager" virtual package and alternative
Bug#53759: revision of the "to build with X support or not" policy
Bug#53762: PROPOSED] applying the FHS to packages that use X
Bug#53763: [AMENDED PROPOSAL] policy for packages providing X fonts
Bug#53763: Objection
Bug#53763: Objections continued
Bug#53849: PROPOSAL: emacs/tex downgrading to optional
Bug#54002: [PROPOSAL] permit use of bzip2 for source packages
Bug#54002: PROPOSAL] permit use of bzip2 for source packages
Re: Bug#54425: gnome-users-guide-en: The link html -> ../../gnome/help/users-guide/C breaks on my system
Bug#54524: http_proxy and web clients.
Bug#54679: packaging-manual: Please include japanese translated version
Bug#54777: debian-policy: registers doc under Apps/Programming, not Debian
Re: Bug#54810: ought to depend on logrotate
Bug#54968: Lintian, archive maintenance and and policy
Bug#54985: debian-policy: handling of shared libraries
Bug#55048: [PROPOSAL] clarify update-rc.d stuff
Bug#55048: PROPOSAL] clarify update-rc.d stuff
Bug#55048: seconded
Bug#55356: packaging-manual: Please clarify multiple architectures WRT control file
Bug#55730: [PROPOSED] Changes in handling library dependencies
Bug#55730: Changes in handling library dependencies
Bug#55730: PROPOSED] Changes in handling library dependencies
Bug#56407: debian-policy: broken links
Bug#56692: Missing entity in debian-policy documents.
Changes in handling library dependencies
Custom undocumented(7)s are just as bad.
Making /usr/doc/XXX symbolic link to ../share/doc/XXX is BAD idea
many packages still using /usr/doc
missing FHS archives
missing man page is wishlist?
packaging manual (was Re: policy summary)
Permissions of /var/log
policy summary
Re: policy summary (new packages without man pages)
Re: policy summary - data section
Re: policy summary [http_proxy]
Processed: I think this belongs against packaging-manual now
Processed: Making /usr/doc/XXX symbolic link to ../share/doc/XXX is BAD idea
static libs depend in -dev not in library packages?
undocumented(7)
undocumented(7) and lintian
Re: unnecessary X fonts directory remains ?
VA.debian.org runs LDAP now
Wait, it *DOES* say all programs! (was Re: Custom undocumented(7)s)
The last update was on 06:17 GMT Sat May 11. There are 339 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc