debian-policy Jan 2000 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1 >
[next page]
[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
[RFD]: Question regarding actions to take on --purge of a package. [sarnold@willamette.edu: Re: Bug#55048: [PROPOSAL] clarify update-rc.d stuff] Ban undocumented(7) for native packages? Bug#39299: marked as done ([AMENDED PROPOSAL] Permit use of bz2 for source packages) Bug#51879: Two seconds, for #53759 and #51879. [hopefully i've gpg signed this correctly] Bug#53755: Seconded: Branden's X Proposals Bug#53755: Seconds Bug#53756: PROPOSED] additions to virtual package list Re: Bug#53758: [PROPOSED] Policy for "x-window-manager" virtual package and alternative Bug#53758: PROPOSED] Policy for "x-window-manager" virtual package and alternative Bug#53759: revision of the "to build with X support or not" policy Bug#53762: PROPOSED] applying the FHS to packages that use X Bug#53763: [AMENDED PROPOSAL] policy for packages providing X fonts Bug#53763: Objection Bug#53763: Objections continued Bug#53849: PROPOSAL: emacs/tex downgrading to optional Bug#54002: [PROPOSAL] permit use of bzip2 for source packages Bug#54002: PROPOSAL] permit use of bzip2 for source packages Re: Bug#54425: gnome-users-guide-en: The link html -> ../../gnome/help/users-guide/C breaks on my system Bug#54524: http_proxy and web clients. Bug#54679: packaging-manual: Please include japanese translated version Bug#54777: debian-policy: registers doc under Apps/Programming, not Debian Re: Bug#54810: ought to depend on logrotate Bug#54968: Lintian, archive maintenance and and policy Bug#54985: debian-policy: handling of shared libraries Bug#55048: [PROPOSAL] clarify update-rc.d stuff Bug#55048: PROPOSAL] clarify update-rc.d stuff Bug#55048: seconded Bug#55356: packaging-manual: Please clarify multiple architectures WRT control file Bug#55730: [PROPOSED] Changes in handling library dependencies Bug#55730: Changes in handling library dependencies Bug#55730: PROPOSED] Changes in handling library dependencies Bug#56407: debian-policy: broken links Bug#56692: Missing entity in debian-policy documents. Changes in handling library dependencies Custom undocumented(7)s are just as bad. Making /usr/doc/XXX symbolic link to ../share/doc/XXX is BAD idea many packages still using /usr/doc missing FHS archives missing man page is wishlist? packaging manual (was Re: policy summary) Permissions of /var/log policy summary Re: policy summary (new packages without man pages) Re: policy summary - data section Re: policy summary [http_proxy] Processed: I think this belongs against packaging-manual now Processed: Making /usr/doc/XXX symbolic link to ../share/doc/XXX is BAD idea static libs depend in -dev not in library packages? undocumented(7) undocumented(7) and lintian Re: unnecessary X fonts directory remains ? VA.debian.org runs LDAP now Wait, it *DOES* say all programs! (was Re: Custom undocumented(7)s) The last update was on 06:17 GMT Sat May 11. There are 339 messages. Page 1 of 1.

<<
[previous month]
|<
[first page]
<
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
>
[next page]
>|
[last page]
>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc