On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 11:01:30PM -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote: > > requirement to have a manpage for every binary. In some larger > > packages, it's pretty difficult to find out what some of those > > binaries do, except that to say that if you take one of them out of > > the path, something will break. They don't always have online help. > > I would expect that a mantainer have a little knowledge of his package. If The point was that it takes more than a "little knowledge" in the case of large packages. > a binary is not meant to be called by the user, it is a bug to have it in > the PATH. Yup. It probably is. In some cases, a permanent bug, since sheer logistics are going to prevent some things from being fixed. So do you prefer that instead of having a bug filed for a missing manpage, you have a bug filed for a possibly incorrect location? Because there's going to be an outstanding report either way. ========================================================================= Zed Pobre <zed@va.debian.org> | PGP key on servers, fingerprint on finger =========================================================================
Attachment:
pgpRa0qTPANtj.pgp
Description: PGP signature