[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#54810: ought to depend on logrotate



On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 03:35:44AM +0000, Steve Haslam wrote:
> > Strictly speaking, there are no "log" files managed in
> > cron.daily/standard. There are status files that are regenerated daily,
> > with backups managed using savelog because it's convenient. I don't
> > think logrotate would quite work.
> 
> OK, so moving logrotate into important isn't necessary for cron. Which
> is good IMHO, the less packages to be moved up like that the better...

Logrotate is already in important and cron already does suggest logrotate.

-- 
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>                 Debian Linux developer
http://tank.debian.net   GnuPG key  pub 1024D/DCF9DAB3  sub 2048g/3F9C2A43
http://www.debian.org    20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3

acme-cannon (3.1415) unstable; urgency=low

  * Added safety to prevent operator dismemberment, closes: bug #98765,
    bug #98713, #98714.
  * Added manpage. closes: #98725.

  -- Wile E. Coyote <genius@debian.org>  Sun, 31 Jan 1999 07:49:57 -0600

Attachment: pgpNKlW8Ft8Qj.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: