Re: policy summary
Chris Waters writes:
> We have a *serious* problem here, IMO, and, while this proposal may
> not be the best solution, we *need* a solution. I'd like to hear some
> alternative proposals if this one is to be discarded.
> (cc'd to the most recent objectors in the probably vain hope that
> they'll be able to put their ideas where their mouth is....)
Which meant I got it twice, given I'm on -policy anyway....
I'm not sure I agree with your argument that undocumented(7) is a
disincentive to write a proper manpage, but that would just be
argument by repeated assertion, so I won't go there.
I still maintain that undocumented(7) serves a useful function (as my
objection said), but perhaps it should be reworded somewhat; maybe we
should encourage people to check the BTS and submit a bug report, or
simply "do submit this as a bug if there isn't an appropriate one
open", since it seems that there often isn't the bug open that
undocumented(7) currently says there is.
"At least you know where you are with Microsoft."
"True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle."