On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 06:28:42AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 03:43:50PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote: > > If either is written in, I gladly revoke my objections because I agree with > > the concept... > > Here is an amended version of the proposal that should address your > concerns. > > There are two changes from the original: > > 1) Added the first enumerated item. X fonts must be split out into their > own packages, basically. > > 2) Asserted that "misc" fonts must not be mixed with 75dpi or 100dpi fonts > at all, instead of making this conditional on something. This policy is > shorter and simpler. With this new version, I withdraw my formal objection and offer a second if that's needed again.. -- Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also. ========================================================================= * http://benham.net/index.html <gecko@benham.net> <>< * * -------------------- * -----------------------------------------------* * Debian Developer, Debian Project Secretary, Debian Webmaster * * <gecko@debian.org> <secretary@debian.org> <lintian-maint@debian.org> * * <webmaster@debian.org> <gecko@fortunet.com> <webmaster@spi-inc.org> * =========================================================================
Attachment:
pgpNlVhWgyAr9.pgp
Description: PGP signature