[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#54810: ought to depend on logrotate



On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 08:16:48PM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 03:35:44AM +0000, Steve Haslam wrote:
> > > Strictly speaking, there are no "log" files managed in
> > > cron.daily/standard. There are status files that are regenerated daily,
> > > with backups managed using savelog because it's convenient. I don't
> > > think logrotate would quite work.
> > 
> > OK, so moving logrotate into important isn't necessary for cron. Which
> > is good IMHO, the less packages to be moved up like that the better...
> 
> Logrotate is already in important and cron already does suggest logrotate.

*blush*

But the fact that I had mailman installed but not logrotate shows that
having it in important wasn't enough...

Hm, maybe a policy amendment isn't in order. But I do think that in
general, packages expecting their logs rotated by logrotate should
depend on logrotate.

SRH
-- 
Steve Haslam      http://www.arise.demon.co.uk/      steve@arise.demon.co.uk
Debian GNU/Linux Maintainer                               araqnid@debian.org
but I won't admit to needing you
I'll never say that's true, not to you                  [sister machine gun]

Attachment: pgp1gy03dda22.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: