debian-policy May 2002 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

撰稿实用宝典

Bug#146703: 写论文，轻松发表有窍门! May 25

Adam Conrad

Bug#147668: base-files: please include the OpenSSL license May 21

Adam Heath

Re: Java Policy. May 13
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 03
Bug#146023: suggested patch against policy, documenting "libexec", or current custom on use of "lib" for binaries in lib* packages May 13
Re: The Serious severity May 08
Re: Java Policy. May 13
Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 26
Re: Java Policy. May 13
Re: Java Policy. May 13
Re: where do NEW packages go? May 19
Re: Java Policy. May 13
Bug#148194: debian-policy: Clarification needed regarding multi-line fields May 29
Re: where do NEW packages go? May 19
Re: Java Policy. May 13

Andrew Pimlott

Re: Java Policy. May 12
Re: Java Policy. May 12
Re: Java Policy. May 12
Re: Java Policy. May 13
Re: Java Policy. May 12
Re: Java Policy. May 12
Re: Free Java specifications (was Re: Java Policy.) May 13

Anthony Towns

Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 02
Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 09
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 03
Re: Bug#146023: suggested patch against policy, documenting "libexec", or current custom on use of "lib" for binaries in lib* packages May 09
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 09
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 09
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 03
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 13
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 06
Re: The Serious severity May 09
Re: The Serious severity May 03
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 13
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 03
Re: The Serious severity May 04
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 10
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 01
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 09
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 03
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 13
Re: The Serious severity May 09
Re: The Serious severity May 04
Re: The Serious severity May 06
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 09

Bob Hilliard

Removal of /usr/doc/<package> symlinks May 21

Branden Robinson

Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 25
Re: The Serious severity May 02
Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 26
Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 26
Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 25
Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 26
Re: The Serious severity May 02
Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 25
Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 27
Re: The Serious severity May 02
Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 27
Re: The Serious severity May 02

Bryan W. Headley

Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 26

Chris Lawrence

Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 06
Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 07
Re: Architecture strings Was: [rms@gnu.org: Re: PATCH: gcc-3.1/criteria.html] May 29

Christopher Browne

Re: Java Policy. May 12

Clint Adams

Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 26
Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 26
Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 28
Re: Bug#148172: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 26
Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 25
Re: Bug#148172: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 25
Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 26
Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 25

Colin Walters

Re: Architecture strings Was: [rms@gnu.org: Re: PATCH: gcc-3.1/criteria.html] May 31

Craig Small

init.d scripts and LSB May 06
Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 06

Daniel Burrows

Re: Policy ambiguity regarding control files May 17

David Pashley

Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 09

David Schleef

Re: Bug#148172: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 26

Debian Bug Tracking System

Processed: Introduction on ADSL May 17
Processed: Re: Bug#147668: base-files: please include the OpenSSL license May 21
Bug#147668: marked as done (base-files: please include the OpenSSL license) May 21
Processed: reassign 132069 to debian-policy May 22

Egon Willighagen

Re: Java Policy. May 12
Re: Java Policy. May 12
Re: Java Policy. May 12
Re: Java Policy. May 12
Re: Java Policy. May 13

Grant Bowman

Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 06
Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 08
Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 07
Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 06
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 10
Re: The Serious severity May 03
Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 07
Re: The Serious severity May 03
Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 07
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 03
Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 07

Henrique de Moraes Holschuh

Re: Architecture strings Was: [rms@gnu.org: Re: PATCH: gcc-3.1/criteria.html] May 30
Re: Architecture strings Was: [rms@gnu.org: Re: PATCH: gcc-3.1/criteria.html] Jun 01
Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 09

Ian Zimmerman

Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 26
Re: Java Policy. May 14

James R. Van Zandt

Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 04

Jeroen Dekkers

Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 06
Re: The Serious severity May 06

Jim Pick

Re: Java Policy. May 13
Re: Java Policy. May 13
Re: Java Policy. May 13
Re: Java Policy. May 12
Re: Java Policy. May 13
Free Java specifications (was Re: Java Policy.) May 13

jjo-Julia-

nimm mich mejou May 23

Joey Hess

Re: Bug#148172: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 26
Re: The Serious severity May 02
Re: Bug#148172: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 25

John R. Daily

Policy ambiguity regarding control files May 14
Re: Policy ambiguity regarding control files May 17
Re: Policy ambiguity regarding control files May 17
Bug#148194: debian-policy: Clarification needed regarding multi-line fields May 26
Re: Policy ambiguity regarding control files May 15

Jonathan Walther

Re: Architecture strings Was: [rms@gnu.org: Re: PATCH: gcc-3.1/criteria.html] May 29

Josip Rodin

Julian Gilbey

Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 06
Bug#146023: suggested patch against policy, documenting "libexec", or current custom on use of "lib" for binaries in lib* packages May 13
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 10
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 06
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 02
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 01
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 06
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 09
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 10
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 03
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 09
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 02
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 02

Junichi Uekawa

Laurence J. Lane

Bug#146756: debian-policy: missing index.html for debian-policy-process May 12

laurent mpeti kabila

[no subject] May 01
[no subject] May 07

Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis

Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 25
Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 26
Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 25
Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 26
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 03
[luca@debian.org: Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices"] May 03

Manoj Srivastava

Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 07
Re: LSB application to systems vs. packages May 07
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 02
Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 06
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 05
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 02
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 02
Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 07
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 03
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 13
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 01
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 06
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 03
Re: Bug#146023: suggested patch against policy, documenting "libexec", or current custom on use of "lib" for binaries in lib* packages May 06
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 13
Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 08
Re: The Serious severity May 02
Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 06
Re: The Serious severity May 02
Re: Policy ambiguity regarding control files May 17
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 02
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 13

Marcus Brinkmann

Re: Architecture strings Was: [rms@gnu.org: Re: PATCH: gcc-3.1/criteria.html] Jun 01
Re: The Serious severity May 04
Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 07
Re: The Serious severity May 04
Re: The Serious severity May 06
Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 07
Re: The Serious severity May 03
Re: The Serious severity May 03

Matthias Klose

Architecture strings Was: [rms@gnu.org: Re: PATCH: gcc-3.1/criteria.html] May 29

Matt Zimmerman

Re: The Serious severity May 03

Michael Banck

Re: where do NEW packages go? May 20
Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 25

Michael Schultheiss

Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 07

Michael Stone

Re: where do NEW packages go? May 20

Miquel van Smoorenburg

Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 07
Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 07

MRS. MARIAM SESE-SEKO

PRIVATE May 06

Nic Ferrier

Re: Java Policy. May 12

Ola Lundqvist

Re: Java Policy. May 12
Re: Java Policy. May 14
Re: Java Policy. May 14
Re: Java Policy. May 12
Java Policy. May 11
Re: Java Policy. May 12
Re: Java Policy. May 12
Re: Java Policy. May 13
Re: Java Policy. May 12
Re: Java Policy. May 12

Oohara Yuuma

Osamu Aoki

Re: Bug#147164: www.debian.org: DDP policy is too out of date May 17
Bug#146703: debian-policy needs to be made by the latest debiandoc-sgml May 12

Per Bothner

Re: Java Policy. May 13
Re: Java Policy. May 13

Richard Braakman

Re: Policy ambiguity regarding control files May 15

Richard Smedley

[OT] oh dear [was Re: The Serious severity] May 03

Rick Lutowski

Re: Java Policy. May 13
Re: Free Java specifications (was Re: Java Policy.) May 13

rnqh_Alexandra

f黵 Dich rrkqb May 23

Robert

May i have your permission? May 11

Robert Bihlmeyer

Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 27

Santiago Vila

Re: Bug#147668: base-files: please include the OpenSSL license May 21

Sean 'Shaleh' Perry

Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 25

Stephen Zander

Re: Java Policy. May 13
Re: Java Policy. May 13
Re: Java Policy. May 12
Re: Java Policy. May 13

Steve Greenland

Steve Kowalik

Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 01

Steve Langasek

Re: where do NEW packages go? May 19
Re: where do NEW packages go? May 20
Re: where do NEW packages go? May 20

Thomas Bushnell, BSG

Re: where do NEW packages go? May 20
Re: where do NEW packages go? May 19
Re: where do NEW packages go? May 20
Re: where do NEW packages go? May 20

Tomas Pospisek

RE: Bug#147668: base-files: please include the OpenSSL license May 21
Re: Bug#147668: base-files: please include the OpenSSL license May 21

Tom Tromey

Re: Java Policy. May 12
Re: Java Policy. May 13

Wichert Akkerman

Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 02
Re: Policy ambiguity regarding control files May 15
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 02
Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 06
Re: The Serious severity May 09
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 03
Re: Bug#148172: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 26
Re: init.d scripts and LSB May 06
Re: Bug#148172: command -v in postinsts violating policy May 26
Re: The Serious severity May 09
Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" May 02

wiopJulie69

Sie haben ein Kontaktgesuch von Julie69 erhalten byclc May 26

Yann Dirson

Bug#147554: debian-policy: doc-base refers to inxistent /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy-process.html/index.html May 20

The last update was on 15:43 GMT Wed May 01. There are 250 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc