Bug#146023: suggested patch against policy, documenting "libexec", or current custom on use of "lib" for binaries in lib* packages
Steve Greenland <steveg@moregruel.net> immo vero scripsit:
> > How about simply:
> >
> > <p>If your package includes run-time support programs that don't need to
> > be invoked manually by the users, or named in a way that would cause
> > conflicts if placed in <tt>$PATH</tt>, but are nevertheless required for
> >- the package to function, you should place them in a subdirectory of
> >- <file>/usr/lib</file>.</p>
>
> + the package to function, you should place them in a subdirectory named
> + <file>/usr/lib/<pkgname></file>.</p>
Sounds better than my patch, and it seems to convey much of the information
that I tried to convey.
regards,
junichi
--
dancer@debian.org : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: