Re: Architecture strings Was: [rms@gnu.org: Re: PATCH: gcc-3.1/criteria.html]
On Wed, 29 May 2002 23:56:11 +0200,
Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
> Ok, now that we separate woody and unstable, it is time to think about
> this. IMO, this is not a gcc only thing. So propably it should be
> changed in dpkg/policy first. debian-<cpu>-linux-gnu and
> <cpu>-linux-gnu come to mind as an alternative.
If a build process needs to know what is on the linux kernel is
the GNU software or not, use build dependency. I don't care
if <cpu>-linux-gnu is aliasd to <cpu>-linux and <cpu>-linux-gnu is
preferred to <cpu>-linux, but I object to mandating <cpu>-linux-gnu
in the policy.
--
Oohara Yuuma <oohara@libra.interq.or.jp>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695
I always put away what I take.
--- Ryuji Akai, "Star away"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: