Re: init.d scripts and LSB
According to Grant Bowman:
> * Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl> [020507 09:07]:
> > If your package is a .lsb package, then it should follow the LSB.
> > However, it appears your package is a .deb package, so why should
> > it follow the LSB?
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> We had this discussion already and you didn't answer my last post in
> January. I have read a different interpretation of the LSB
> specification than you have. Any comment?
No. Perhaps our interpretations are different. So be it. I just
happen to think that my interpretation is the right one.
For example, for LSB compliance, you need to link against glibc-2.0.x.
How can a native woody package *ever* be compliant ? It can't,
and it isn't supposed to be. Same story with the init scripts.
Mike.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: