Re: Java Policy.
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> Ok, then it is just a question of naming. Say my foo library can be
> compiled to .class files and GCJ .so files. One option is to
> package both in libfoo-java, which would be architecture specific.
> But if you want to split them into an architecture-specific and an
> architecture-independent package, what do you call them? libfoo-java
> and libfoo-gcj-java?
Btw, kaffe has gcj support, and can load gcj-compile .so files, or something
like that.
Current cvs appears broken, however.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: