[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#146023: suggested patch against policy, documenting "libexec", or current custom on use of "lib" for binaries in lib* packages



On Fri, 10 May 2002 16:13:28 -0500,
Steve Greenland <steveg@moregruel.net> wrote:
> On 09-May-02, 13:53 (CDT), Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr> wrote: 
> > How about simply:
> > 
> >   <p>If your package includes run-time support programs that don't need to
> >   be invoked manually by the users, or named in a way that would cause
> >   conflicts if placed in <tt>$PATH</tt>, but are nevertheless required for
> >-  the package to function, you should place them in a subdirectory of
> >-  <file>/usr/lib</file>.</p>
> 
> +  the package to function, you should place them in a subdirectory named
> +  <file>/usr/lib/<pkgname></file>.</p>
seconded

-- 
Oohara Yuuma <oohara@libra.interq.or.jp>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170  1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695

I always put away what I take.
--- Ryuji Akai, "Star away"

Attachment: pgpgcqlPUPpCq.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: