[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy



Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> writes:

> Let me be perfectly clear:
> 
> KEEP YOUR HANDS OFF OF XFREE86.

Chill. Nobody will touch your preciousss.

Anyway, what prevents the documentation of existing practise in
policy? I.e. inserting an additional dependency on "command -v",
perhaps to be deleted when we figure out a better alternative.

The simplest way, of course, is to state in the release notes that
zsh, although POSIX-compliant (is it really?) should not be used as
/bin/sh.

-- 
Robbe

Attachment: signature.ng
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: