[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy



On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 09:31:36AM +0200, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> Hi Branden,
> do you mind if i start working on your packages to replace any occurrence of
> the 'command -v' with any other alternative good solution?

Yes, I mind a great deal.  I am not soliciting patches to correct this
"problem", and don't even think about NMUing packages.

So far, no one has proposed a standards-compliant way of solving the
problem that retains command -v's robustness.

> I'm sure that policy rocks, and that task may be accomplished be any
> developer, so the only way i can demonstrate it is doing.

Let me be perfectly clear:

KEEP YOUR HANDS OFF OF XFREE86.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |    Somewhere, there is a .sig so funny
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    that reading it will cause an
branden@debian.org                 |    aneurysm.  This is not that .sig.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: pgpxdl6aDx39N.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: