On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 09:31:36AM +0200, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote: > Hi Branden, > do you mind if i start working on your packages to replace any occurrence of > the 'command -v' with any other alternative good solution? Yes, I mind a great deal. I am not soliciting patches to correct this "problem", and don't even think about NMUing packages. So far, no one has proposed a standards-compliant way of solving the problem that retains command -v's robustness. > I'm sure that policy rocks, and that task may be accomplished be any > developer, so the only way i can demonstrate it is doing. Let me be perfectly clear: KEEP YOUR HANDS OFF OF XFREE86. -- G. Branden Robinson | Somewhere, there is a .sig so funny Debian GNU/Linux | that reading it will cause an branden@debian.org | aneurysm. This is not that .sig. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpEFSeBqMLBL.pgp
Description: PGP signature