[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Architecture strings Was: [rms@gnu.org: Re: PATCH: gcc-3.1/criteria.html]



Ok, now that we separate woody and unstable, it is time to think about
this. IMO, this is not a gcc only thing. So propably it should be
changed in dpkg/policy first. debian-<cpu>-linux-gnu and
<cpu>-linux-gnu come to mind as an alternative.

Ben Collins writes:
> Just a heads up on what is about to happen. RMS is complaining that we
> use "<cpu>-linux" instead of "<cpu>-linux-gnu". I know there's a lot of
> dependency in our tools on the naming scheme, but we may want to
> consider adding that "-gnu" and see what is involved.
> 
> ----- Forwarded message from Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> -----
> 
> X-Virus-Scanner: McAfee Virus Engine
> X-Spam-Status: Scanner Called
> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> To: bcollins@debian.org
> CC: pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: PATCH: gcc-3.1/criteria.html
> Reply-to: rms@gnu.org
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=6.5 tests= version=2.1
> 
>     Debian uses the names that simplify coding of our packaging system.  All
>     of our GNU/Linux architectures use "<cpu>-linux".
> 
> That was a mistake, I gather.
> 
>     Is there some technical reason that we need this? What makes your
>     suggestion correct, when what we use has always worked for us?
> 
> If it is meant to be a GNU configuration name, it is not correct.  It
> omits the second part, and the system name is in nonstandard form.
> 
> Besides the technical problem, there is the communication problem.
> This says something wrong to humans--it encourages people to think
> that the whole system is "Linux".  For our sake, please change this.
> 
> 
> ----- End forwarded message -----
> 
> -- 
>  .----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=-----.
> /       Ben Collins    --    Debian GNU/Linux    --    WatchGuard.com      \
> `          bcollins@debian.org   --   Ben.Collins@watchguard.com           '
>  `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: