[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: init.d scripts and LSB



>>"Grant" == Grant Bowman <grantbow@grantbow.com> writes:

 Grant> * Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl> [020507 09:07]:
 >> If your package is a .lsb package, then it should follow the LSB.
 >> However, it appears your package is a .deb package, so why should
 >> it follow the LSB?

 Grant> We had this discussion already and you didn't answer my last post in
 Grant> January.  I have read a different interpretation of the LSB
 Grant> specification than you have.  Any comment?

	Yes. I think I agree with  Miquel, the LSB is a spec meant for
 LSB packages. Debian packages are not meant to be LSB packages, and
 thus the LSB spec does not apply. 

 Grant> http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2002/debian-policy-200201/msg00012.html

	I see nothing relevant in that message. You appear to be
 reading the LSB spec to see if it has any exceptions (and, since it
 applies only to third party LSB packages, it is not surprising you
 did not see any exeptions for vendor packages).

	Footnote 2 that you mentioned seems to say that the LSB spec
 does not apply to vendor packages or mechanisms.

	manoj
-- 
 "I don't believe that the answer to white racism is black racism."
 Spiro T. Agnew, then Governor of Maryland
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: