Re: Java Policy.
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 04:28:56PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Pimlott <email@example.com> writes:
> Andrew> To clarify, I'm talking about Java code compiled (eg, by
> Andrew> gcj) into architecture-specific machine code. These
> Andrew> libraries are still meant to be used by Java code (also
> Andrew> compiled with gcj), not C code. So I think java should
> Andrew> still be part of the name.
> That statement is true iff you can use the gjc produced .so files with
> kaffa/jdk/etc without *any* additional coding/configuratiojn/whatever.
> I don't think that condition is satisfiable right now.
No it's not. But you can use the gcj produced .so files with gcj.
If I do all my Java development with gcj, Debian packages containing
Java libraries compiled to .so's are very useful to me.
PS. s/gjc/gcj/g ;-)
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com