Re: init.d scripts and LSB

To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: init.d scripts and LSB
From: Grant Bowman <grantbow@grantbow.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 08:41:53 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020506154153.GB20567@grantbow.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020506151907.GE517@wiggy.net>
References: <[🔎] 20020506031609.GA18981@eye-net.com.au> <[🔎] 20020506144953.GC1787@celeron.dekkers> <[🔎] 20020506151907.GE517@wiggy.net>

* Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net> [020506 08:25]:
> Previously Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > Debian is more than GNU/Linux. I see no reason why Debian GNU/Hurd and
> > Debian *BSD should follow the LSB.
> 
> This is a discussion we should be having after the release on a forum
> like debian-project.

Agreed.

-- 
-- Grant Bowman                                <grantbow@grantbow.com>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- init.d scripts and LSB
  - From: csmall@eye-net.com.au (Craig Small)
- Re: init.d scripts and LSB
  - From: Jeroen Dekkers <jeroen@dekkers.cx>
- Re: init.d scripts and LSB
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>

Prev by Date: Re: The Serious severity
Next by Date: Bug#146023: suggested patch against policy, documenting "libexec", or current custom on use of "lib" for binaries in lib* packages
Previous by thread: Re: init.d scripts and LSB
Next by thread: Re: init.d scripts and LSB
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread