Re: Java Policy.

[Stephen Zander <gibreel@debian.org>]

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Pimlott <ota-31@andrew.pimlott.net> writes:
    Andrew> To clarify, I'm talking about Java code compiled (eg, by
    Andrew> gcj) into architecture-specific machine code.  These
    Andrew> libraries are still meant to be used by Java code (also
    Andrew> compiled with gcj), not C code.  So I think java should
    Andrew> still be part of the name.

That statement is true iff you can use the gjc produced .so files with
kaffa/jdk/etc without *any* additional coding/configuratiojn/whatever.
I don't think that condition is satisfiable right now.

.java => gjc => executable/shared object is a one-way function.

-- 
Stephen

"A duck!"


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org