Re: The Serious severity
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 09:32:25AM -0700, Grant Bowman wrote:
> * Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> [020503 09:21]:
> > On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 08:16:32PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > There may be subtle differences between the meanings of the various
> > > terms, but they are *very* strongly correlated, which is right at the
> > > other extreme from orthogonality.
> >
> > They are only corrolated if you want to do that, and it causes anomalies and
> > fraction between developers, and make it impossible to manage bugs for an
> > unreleased architectures efficiently.
>
> I don't think this clouds the discussion since the unreleased
> architecture bugs can be handled in a way other than the official BTS.
I don't understand what you mean, can you be specific? What "other
way" is there to report a bug in the Debian packaging that only
shows up on the Hurd or on BSD, or, for that matter, on some new
Linux port (think of svgalib or some other feature not being available)?
> As crazy as this idea sounds, I think weakening the whole system
> definitions for the sake of the unreleased parts is untenable.
I do not understand what you mean by weakening. I certainly did not
suggest to weaken the BTS, what am I missing? Which system are you
talking about here?
Thanks,
Marcus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: