debian-legal Mar 2004 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1 >
[next page]
[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
[no subject] ? [Maybe OT] License problem Re: [OT] "is really" (Was: Re: Patent issues) Ada Community License - DFSG Adding modified autoconf macro to a QPLed tree Re: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL? Re: Bug#192748: Debian-legal summary of the OPL Re: Bug#227793: pgeasy has no copyright Re: Bug#239952: kernel-source-2.6.4: qla2xxx contains non-free fi rmware Re: Bug#239952: kernel-source-2.6.4: qla2xxx contains non-free fi rmware Re: Bug#239952: kernel-source-2.6.4: qla2xxx contains non-free fi rmware Re: Bug#239952: kernel-source-2.6.4: qla2xxx contains non-free firmware Re: Bug#239952: kernel-source-2.6.4: qla2xxx contains non-freefirmware CCPL-by Cryptlib - is it DFSG-free? Cryptlib licence Debian & the Mozilla Firefox Trademarks Re: Debian Legal summary of the X-Oz License Debian-installer, older hardware, boot loaders, miboot & amiboot & .. Debian-legal summary of the OPL DRAFT summary of the OPL; feedback requested Experience with convincing people to DFSGize their licenses? Fonts-HQ.com GIF patent [Debian Weekly News - March 2nd, 2004] GPL , what does it mean? -- the name that is. The GPL license document "COPYING" is not DFSG-free GPL+ for docs (Was: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible?) Guidelines for writing d-l summaries (draft, still) HELP ME! Re: Re: Hi [#1316782] Re: If DFSG apply to non-software, is GPL*L* incompatible with DFSG? Re: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible? Re: license for Federal Information Processing Standards license for paintlib License for the Torque Resource Manager (RFC) Re: licensing confusion Re: Mozilla Firefox's icon and trademark mplayer MPlayer reloaded Re: The MySQL FOSS Exception v0.1 nmap licensing claims Open Publication License v1.0 is not DFSG-free. WWW pages need relicensing? OpenPBS/Torque license conclusion? please comment on mplayer 1.0-pre-cvs Re: POSSIVEL SPAM-- Re: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL? problem with missing license -- what's the procedure ? Re: Referencing the DFSG [Re: DRAFT summary of the OPL; feedback requested] Re: Referencing the DFSG [Re: DRAFT summary of the OPL; feedback requested] Referencing the DFSG [Re: DRAFT summary of the OPL; feedback requested] Severity of trademark problems Shirts subscribe subversion in main? Re: Summary: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible?, was Re : GPL+ for docs Re: Summary: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible?, was Re: GPL+ for docs Summary: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible?, was Re: GPL+ for docs T-Shirts & IP This is yours to keep for Free to Andrew Suffield Tracking -legal decisions [Was: Re: DRAFT summary of the OPL; feedback requested] A virus has been detected in a document you authored. X-Oz Technologies X-Oz: Next Move, was: Debian Legal summary of the X-Oz License Re: Your Amazon.com Inquiry The last update was on 06:16 GMT Wed Jun 05. There are 414 messages. Page 1 of 1.

<<
[previous month]
|<
[first page]
<
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
>
[next page]
>|
[last page]
>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc