debian-legal Mar 2004 by subject
|
[previous page]
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[next page]
|
|
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
[no subject]
?
[Maybe OT] License problem
Re: [OT] "is really" (Was: Re: Patent issues)
Ada Community License - DFSG
Adding modified autoconf macro to a QPLed tree
Re: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL?
Re: Bug#192748: Debian-legal summary of the OPL
Re: Bug#227793: pgeasy has no copyright
Re: Bug#239952: kernel-source-2.6.4: qla2xxx contains non-free fi rmware
Re: Bug#239952: kernel-source-2.6.4: qla2xxx contains non-free fi rmware
Re: Bug#239952: kernel-source-2.6.4: qla2xxx contains non-free fi rmware
Re: Bug#239952: kernel-source-2.6.4: qla2xxx contains non-free firmware
Re: Bug#239952: kernel-source-2.6.4: qla2xxx contains non-freefirmware
CCPL-by
Cryptlib - is it DFSG-free?
Cryptlib licence
Debian & the Mozilla Firefox Trademarks
Re: Debian Legal summary of the X-Oz License
Debian-installer, older hardware, boot loaders, miboot & amiboot & ..
Debian-legal summary of the OPL
DRAFT summary of the OPL; feedback requested
Experience with convincing people to DFSGize their licenses?
Fonts-HQ.com
GIF patent [Debian Weekly News - March 2nd, 2004]
GPL , what does it mean? -- the name that is.
The GPL license document "COPYING" is not DFSG-free
GPL+ for docs (Was: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible?)
Guidelines for writing d-l summaries (draft, still)
HELP ME!
Re: Re: Hi [#1316782]
Re: If DFSG apply to non-software, is GPL*L* incompatible with DFSG?
Re: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible?
Re: license for Federal Information Processing Standards
license for paintlib
License for the Torque Resource Manager (RFC)
Re: licensing confusion
Re: Mozilla Firefox's icon and trademark
mplayer
MPlayer reloaded
Re: The MySQL FOSS Exception v0.1
nmap licensing claims
Open Publication License v1.0 is not DFSG-free. WWW pages need relicensing?
OpenPBS/Torque license conclusion?
please comment on mplayer 1.0-pre-cvs
Re: POSSIVEL SPAM-- Re: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL?
problem with missing license -- what's the procedure ?
Re: Referencing the DFSG [Re: DRAFT summary of the OPL; feedback requested]
Re: Referencing the DFSG [Re: DRAFT summary of the OPL; feedback requested]
Referencing the DFSG [Re: DRAFT summary of the OPL; feedback requested]
Severity of trademark problems
Shirts
subscribe
subversion in main?
Re: Summary: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible?, was Re : GPL+ for docs
Re: Summary: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible?, was Re: GPL+ for docs
Summary: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible?, was Re: GPL+ for docs
T-Shirts & IP
This is yours to keep for Free
to Andrew Suffield
Tracking -legal decisions [Was: Re: DRAFT summary of the OPL; feedback requested]
A virus has been detected in a document you authored.
X-Oz Technologies
X-Oz: Next Move, was: Debian Legal summary of the X-Oz License
Re: Your Amazon.com Inquiry
The last update was on 06:16 GMT Wed Jun 05. There are 414 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc