On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 12:30:58PM -0800, Number Six wrote: > On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 09:47:45AM -0500, Adam Kessel wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 05:58:31AM -0800, Number Six wrote: > > > Searching google for "MR Ray" and "DFSG" only turns up hits for GDFL. > > > I'm sure there has been a debate on the GPL itself, but I can't find it. > > > Can you provide me more useful keywords than "GPL", "COPYING", "DFSG"? > > > Those aren't cutting it. > > > > Here, try this: > > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/debian-legal-200402/msg00286.html > > Yet another case of The Barber Shaves All Those in Town Who Do Not Shave > Themselves: the question of whether a set is a member of itself always > leads to antimonies. Humans always draw a line in the sand and say: > Beyond This Point, We Shall Not Go. Here, there Be Dragons. > > Another example of this sort of thing is in SQL: In SQL, you have a > tri-valued logic system, where: NULL ThetaOp Anything Equals NULL. > > And you have the group by statement, who groups together things with a > Comparision Truth Value of Equal. > > Except it also groups together NULLs :-) This reply is meaningless to me. Here's another example of how your observation is old news: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200203/msg00009.html Please be sure you have something new to add before perpetuating this thread. -- G. Branden Robinson | When we call others dogmatic, what Debian GNU/Linux | we really object to is their branden@debian.org | holding dogmas that are different http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | from our own. -- Charles Issawi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature