debian-legal Mar 2000 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Nicolás Lichtmaier

Re: Free Documentation License Mar 12
Re: AT&T source code agreement Mar 23

Andrew McRobert

[no subject] Mar 16

Ashley Clark

vnterm3.3 Copyright Mar 15

Ben Harris

Re: example of AT&T using free license. Mar 23

Ben Pfaff

Re: AT&T source code agreement Mar 23

Branden Robinson

Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork] Mar 28
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 14
Re: AT&T source code agreement Mar 22
Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork] Mar 29
Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork] Mar 29
Re: example of AT&T using free license. Mar 23

Brian Kimball

GPL: collective works Mar 16
Re: GPL: collective works Mar 17
Re: GPL: meaning of "independent and separate works" Mar 29
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 29
GPL: meaning of "independent and separate works" Mar 16

Brian Ristuccia

Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 14
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 14
Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork] Mar 28

bug1

[Fwd: license for iozone] Mar 01
license for iozone Mar 10
What type of license for iozone Mar 01
Re: license for iozone Mar 10

Christoph Baumann

[andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork] Mar 27
Re: Copyright problem with new maelstrom licence Mar 24
Maelstrom Copyright Mar 26
Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork] Mar 29
Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork] Mar 29
Copyright problem with new maelstrom licence Mar 24
Re: Copyright problem with new maelstrom licence Mar 24

Chuan-kai Lin

License of Meschach Mar 10

Craig Sanders

Re: real ksh available as sources Mar 03

David N. Welton

Re: ARM release status Mar 21

David Starner

Re: Copyright problem with new maelstrom licence Mar 24
Re: AT&T source code agreement Mar 22
Re: Copyright problem with new maelstrom licence Mar 24
Re: AT&T source licence? Mar 04

debian-legal-request

Unidentified subject! Mar 01
Unidentified subject! Mar 01

Don Marti

Re: What type of license for iozone Mar 01

Elie Rosenblum

Re: real ksh available as sources Mar 03
Re: AT&T source code agreement Mar 22
Re: AT&T source code agreement Mar 22
Re: AT&T source code agreement Mar 22

Eric Sherrill

RE: AT&T source code agreement Mar 28
RE: AT&T source code agreement Mar 22
RE: AT&T source code agreement Mar 23

Fabien Ninoles

Re: Free Documentation License Mar 13
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 15
Re: Free Documentation License Mar 13
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 16

ferret

Re: GPL: collective works Mar 17

Henning Makholm

Re: AT&T source code agreement Mar 22
Re: AT&T source code agreement Mar 22
Re: AT&T source licence? Mar 03
Re: AT&T source code agreement Mar 22
Re: What type of license for iozone Mar 01
Re: License of Meschach Mar 10
Re: [Fwd: license for iozone] Mar 02
Re: AT&T source code agreement Mar 22
Re: real ksh available as sources Mar 03

Jeff Teunissen

Re: license for iozone Mar 10

Jeffry_Smith

Re: ARM release status Mar 21

Joey Hess

Re: Free Documentation License Mar 12
Re: AT&T source licence? Mar 04
Re: Free Documentation License Mar 11

Joseph Carter

Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork] Mar 28
Re: 'impact' ttf license? Mar 15
Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork] Mar 28

Juergen A. Erhard

Examples for non-freeness (Was: Re: AT&T source licence?) Mar 11

Juhapekka Tolvanen

real ksh available as sources Mar 03

Jules Bean

Re: Free Documentation License Mar 12
Re: Free Documentation License Mar 11

Marcus Brinkmann

Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 16
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 14
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 15
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 16
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 14
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 15
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 16
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 14

Mark Rafn

example of AT&T using free license. Mar 23
Re: Copyright problem with new maelstrom licence Mar 24

Michael Meskes

Question Mar 15

Raul Miller

Re: Free Documentation License Mar 13
Re: An advise how to apply for the TkMan author to change his license. Mar 08
Re: Free Documentation License Mar 11

Remco Blaakmeer

Re: AT&T source code agreement Mar 28

Richard Braakman

Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork] Mar 27

Ronald L . Chichester

Re: Question Mar 15

SCOTT FENTON

Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 14
Re: Question Mar 15

Sean 'Shaleh' Perry

RE: Is this good enough for non-free? Mar 07

Shaul Karl

Re: An advise how to apply for the TkMan author to change his license. Mar 08
Re: An advise how to apply for the TkMan author to change his license. Mar 15

Stefan Ott

Re: 'impact' ttf license? Mar 15

Stephane Bortzmeyer

AT&T source licence? Mar 03
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 14
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 16
[GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 14
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 16
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 14
Re: AT&T source licence? Mar 03
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 16

Stephen C. North

Re: AT&T source code agreement Mar 22
Re: AT&T source code agreement Mar 22
Re: AT&T source code agreement Mar 22
Re: AT&T source code agreement Mar 22
Re: AT&T source code agreement Mar 22

Steve Greenland

Re: AT&T source code agreement Mar 23

Thomas Bushnell, BSG

Re: AT&T source code agreement Mar 28
Re: AT&T source code agreement Mar 28
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others Mar 01
Re: GPL: meaning of "independent and separate works" Mar 28
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 28

Tomasz Wegrzanowski

Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 14
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 15
Re: vnterm3.3 Copyright Mar 15
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 14
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 14
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 14
Re: Question Mar 15

Tommi Virtanen

Is this good enough for non-free? Mar 04

William T Wilson

Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Mar 15

��

��,�Ͼ� ��Ȱȸȭ �� mailing service �ȳ�!! Mar 01

The last update was on 09:25 GMT Sat May 11. There are 126 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc