Re: real ksh available as sources
On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 09:29:54AM -0500, Elie Rosenblum wrote:
> I think we could put it in non-free, _if_ a maintainer was willing to
> go through the patch notification hassle.
what does real ksh have that pdksh, bash, and/or zsh doesn't?
sounds to me like it is too non-free to bother with, especially when we
have free alternatives.
of course, if someone wants to go to all that trouble just to get it in
non-free then that's their choice.
craig
--
craig sanders
Reply to: