Re: AT&T source code agreement
"Stephen C. North" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Yes, if "delivering custom-modified" software includes sharing source code
> with customers, the AT&T Source Code Agreement further requires sharing
> the patches with AT&T. If you keep the patches private my reading of the
> AT&T license is that you can still redistribute binaries. I just realized
> to my slight surprise and amusement.
> But doesn't the GPL also require the sharing of source code?
The GPL requires that if you distribute a binary to someone,
you must also distribute source to that person. It does not
require you to distribute source or binaries to third parties.
 In essence; it is possible to nitpick at this point.