[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Free Documentation License

Jules Bean wrote:
> Since it doesn't apply to software, that's a non-issue.

I'm very tempted to go package up, say, the quake1 level files and try to
upload them to main. After all, they're not software, so who gives a hoot
if they violate the DFSG?

> It does, once again, re-raise the issue of whether we need to a)
> extend the DFSG to cover documentation, or b) establish some kind of
> debian guidelines for acceptable document licenses.
> Note that we do include a variety of textual works (documents) whose
> license doesn't comply with the DFSG.

Yes, and I hate it. It's damned hypocritical

see shy jo

Reply to: