Re: What type of license for iozone
On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 05:37:06PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> He could copy and paste from
> http://www.debian.org/misc/bsd.license
> (but clause 3 of that license should be left out).
The X11 license is the closest to the "BSD license without the
advertising clause" that the author seems to want.
Cut and paste http://www.x.org/terms.htm, put the author's name in in
place of the Open Group, and Bob's your uncle. The key advantage of the
X11 license over the BSD license is that you can borrow X11-licensed
code for a work covered by GPL or LGPL.
A good field guide to licenses is:
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html
--
Don Marti Burn all GIFs: http://burnallgifs.org/
dmarti@zgp.org Linux rules: http://srom.zgp.org/
http://zgp.org/~dmarti You know you want this software:
whois DM683 http://zgp.org/~dmarti/warez/decss.tar.gz
Reply to: