Re: AT&T source code agreement

["Stephen C. North" <north@research.att.com>]

> I don't rule out someone distributing software licensed with the
> current license as part of non-free; if a maintainer wants to jump
> through whatever hoops are required, they are free to do so. I
> think if you got rid of the requirement to resubmit patches, there
> would be a better chance of a debian developer picking up the non-
> free package.

The license says you can just provide AT&T with a URL.
Is that http://www.debian.org/distrib/something?
Should we considered AT&T notified?
End of discussion?

I don't want to nitpick, but isn't that the very essence of this process :-)