Re: AT&T source licence?
On Sat 3 March 2000, at 15 h 52, the keyboard of Henning Makholm
> > interested in is under this licence. Does anyone know it? It seems clearly
> > non-free, but not too much non-free :-}
> We have discussed it before.
A list of non-free licences, as well as the reasons they are non-free could be
useful. rms would certainly blame us to advertise non-freeness, but it could
> Any kind of nonfreeness is too much.
I agree it is for the "non-free" archive. But does anyone see a larger problem, which would prevent it to get into Debian?