Re: real ksh available as sources
I think we could put it in non-free, _if_ a maintainer was willing
to go through the patch notification hassle.
The stuff that jumps out at me is all the stuff about notifying them
about patches, and also paragraph 3 of GENERAL.
On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 03:08:33PM +0200, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
>
> More information is here:
>
> http://www.kornshell.com/
>
> http://www.research.att.com/~gsf/download/gen/ast-open.html
>
> Licence is here:
>
> http://www.research.att.com/sw/license/ast-open.html
>
> Does anybody know, if that licence qualifies as a Free Software licence
> according to DFSG?
>
> P.S: I don't subscribe these lists, but I am smart enough to read
> mailing list archives in WWW. If you want, you can Cc: to me.
>
> --
> -- Juhapekka "naula" Tolvanen * * * U of Jyväskylä * * juhtolv@st.jyu.fi --
> -- http://www.cc.jyu.fi/~juhtolv/ * * * * " STRAIGHT BUT NOT NARROW !! " --
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "I don't want to run a company. I'm not good at managing people. You have
> a problem with the guy in the next cubicle? I don't care. Shoot him or
> something." Marc Andreessen, founder of Netscape, in Rolling Stone, May '97
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
Elie Rosenblum That is not dead which can eternal lie,
http://www.cosanostra.net And with strange aeons even death may die.
Admin / Mercenary / System Programmer - _The Necronomicon_
Reply to: