debian-legal Jun 1999 by subject
![[First Page]](/images/first.png) |
[previous page]
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[next page]
|
![[Last Page]](/images/last.png) |
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
6 GPL'ed Packages that depend on XForms.
[New pine license]
[Wietse Venema: Please review: Official IBM Public License]
[wietse@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema)] Please review: Official IBM Public License
[wietse@porcupine.org: Please review: Official IBM Public License]
bladeenc
Re: bruce: call me
BURT license
bzflag license
CDF ?
Re: copyright must be written in English?
DFSG And Trademarks
Re: Editor and sensible-editor
a fronted gpl for a non-free package
GPL exception statement (was Qt 2.0 is out)
GPL: what does redistribution mean?
IBM public license
IBM Public Source License
Is it illegal to distribute Linux kernel? KDE precedent.
Re: ITP: ILU
Re: ITP: xengine
Re: ITP: xslideshow
Re: KDE liscence question
Fwd: Re: kdrill SKIP bug
licence of CommAPI from Sun
Re: License
license check
License for Library
license says `distribute it with the full sources'
Licensing Question
LPPL again
NEC Licence (Work of US Gov. Employees)
NEdit Text Editor License for Review
Re: non-English copyright
Re: Please Review: Official IBM Public License
Possible GPL violation?
Qt 2.0 is out, with its new licence
Question about licensing
tipa-type1: checking for DSFG compliance
Re: wdg-html-reference_1.0-3_i386.changes REJECTED
Werken Public License
XForms GPL exception...
The last update was on 06:00 GMT Sat May 11. There are 271 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc
