Re: NEC Licence (Work of US Gov. Employees)

[Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>]

John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org> quotes Title 17:
> > (b) The copyright in a compilation or derivative work extends only to
> > the material contributed by the author of such work, as distinguished
> > from the preexisting material employed in the work, and does not imply
> > any exclusive right in the preexisting material. The copyright in such
> > work is independent of, and does not affect or enlarge the scope,
> > duration, ownership, or subsistence of, any copyright protection in
> > the preexisting material.

Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com> writes:
> But there is no copyright on U.S. Government issued materials, nor
> on public domain materials, so this paragraph isn't really relevant.

Ben Pfaff <pfaffben@msu.edu> wrote:
> But it is.  It says that you can't extend a copyright of your own to
> something that you didn't write.  It doesn't say that the preexisting
> material has to be copyrighted itself.

It says that you can't enlarge the scope, etc. of any copyright
protection in the prexisting material.

There is no copyright protection in the prexisting material, so I fail
to see how that paragraph is relevant.

-- 
Raul