Re: XForms GPL exception...
On 21 Jun 1999, Henning Makholm wrote:
> But your proposed rephasing seems less than ideal - it sounds as if
> you are giving a guarantee that the XForms people will never change
> their minds about future libraries they choose to call XForms (and,
> for that matter, that the license file you've looked at was not
> faked).
Got it. How about "You still need a separate licence to do so from the
owner(s) of the copyright for XForms, see the XForms copyright."?
- Tom
Reply to: