debian-r Jun 2018 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Re: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5
Andreas Tille
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5
Andreas Tille
Re: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5
Sébastien Villemot
Re: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5
Andreas Tille
Re: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Andreas Tille
Re: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Sébastien Villemot
Re: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Andreas Tille
Re: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Graham Inggs
Re: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Graham Inggs
Re: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Graham Inggs
Re: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Re: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Graham Inggs
Re: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Graham Inggs
Re: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Re: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Re: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Graham Inggs
Re: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Graham Inggs
Re: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Graham Inggs
Re: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Graham Inggs
Re: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Andreas Tille
Re: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Re: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Andreas Tille
Re: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Graham Inggs
Re: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Andreas Tille
Status of transition and fastcluster issue
Andreas Tille
Re: Status of transition and fastcluster issue
Graham Inggs
Re: Status of transition and fastcluster issue
Andreas Tille
Re: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Andreas Tille
Re: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Andreas Tille
Re: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Graham Inggs
Re: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Andreas Tille
Re: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Re: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Re: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Re: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Andreas Tille
Re: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Dirk Eddelbuettel
NMUed tseries (Was: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5?)
Andreas Tille
Broken versioned Depends on quantmod (Was: NMUed tseries)
Andreas Tille
Re: Broken versioned Depends on quantmod (Was: NMUed tseries)
Andreas Tille
Re: Broken versioned Depends on quantmod (Was: NMUed tseries)
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Closing bug (Was: Broken versioned Depends on quantmod)
Andreas Tille
Re: Closing bug (Was: Broken versioned Depends on quantmod)
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Re: Closing bug (Was: Broken versioned Depends on quantmod)
Andreas Tille
Re: Closing bug (Was: Broken versioned Depends on quantmod)
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Re: Closing bug (Was: Broken versioned Depends on quantmod)
Andreas Tille
Re: Closing bug (Was: Broken versioned Depends on quantmod)
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Re: Closing bug (Was: Broken versioned Depends on quantmod)
Graham Inggs
Re: Closing bug (Was: Broken versioned Depends on quantmod)
Dirk Eddelbuettel
R 3.5.0 transition, next up car which is waiting on rio in NEW
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Re: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Andreas Tille
Re: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
Graham Inggs
Re: R-base-3.5 transition: Team maintained arch:all packages in level 1 done
Andreas Tille
Re: R-base-3.5 transition: Team maintained arch:all packages in level 1 done
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Who is doing what ? (Re: R-base-3.5 transition) level 1 done
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Re: Who is doing what ? (Re: R-base-3.5 transition) level 1 done
Andreas Tille
Re: Who is doing what ? (Re: R-base-3.5 transition) level 1 done
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Re: Who is doing what ? (Re: R-base-3.5 transition) level 1 done
Charles Plessy
r-cran-pkgkitten, codetools, rcpp (Was: Who is doing what ? (Re: R-base-3.5 transition) level 1 done)
Andreas Tille
Re: r-cran-pkgkitten, codetools, rcpp (Was: Who is doing what ? (Re: R-base-3.5 transition) level 1 done)
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Re: r-cran-pkgkitten, codetools, rcpp (Was: Who is doing what ? (Re: R-base-3.5 transition) level 1 done)
Dirk Eddelbuettel
r-cran-iterators and rjava remain missing (Was: r-cran-pkgkitten, codetools, rcpp)
Andreas Tille
Re: r-cran-iterators and rjava remain missing (Was: r-cran-pkgkitten, codetools, rcpp)
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Bug#900567: r-cran-wdi: Package (Build-)Depends from non-free package r-cran-rjsonio
Andreas Tille
Sorry for the noise (Was: Bug#900567: r-cran-wdi: Package (Build-)Depends from non-free package r-cran-rjsonio)
Andreas Tille
Bug#900591: FTBFS against R 3.5: The C compiler identification is unknown
Sébastien Villemot
HTML doc of biomformat contains compressed jquery components
Andreas Tille
How to deal with autogenerated HTML docs containing compressed JS (Was: HTML doc of biomformat contains compressed jquery components)
Andreas Tille
About different opinions of version numbering schemes containg '.' and '-' (Was: [devteam-bioc] BioConductor phyloseq defines relation to not yet existing ade4 version])
Andreas Tille
Re: About different opinions of version numbering schemes containg '.' and '-' (Was: [devteam-bioc] BioConductor phyloseq defines relation to not yet existing ade4 version])
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Re: About different opinions of version numbering schemes containg '.' and '-' (Was: [devteam-bioc] BioConductor phyloseq defines relation to not yet existing ade4 version])
Andreas Tille
Please use "Imports: XML (>= 3.98-1.3)" since XML has dash in version string
Andreas Tille
Re: Please use "Depends: gnm (>= 1.0-3)" in vcdExtra since gnm has dash in version string
Andreas Tille
Please use "Depends: lme4 (>= 1.1-10), Imports: Matrix (>= 1.2-3)" in pbkrtest since those packages have dashes in version string
Andreas Tille
Re: Please use "Depends: lme4 (>= 1.1-10), Imports: Matrix (>= 1.2-3)" in pbkrtest since those packages have dashes in version string
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Re: Please use "Depends: lme4 (>= 1.1-10), Imports: Matrix (>= 1.2-3)" in pbkrtest since those packages have dashes in version string
Andreas Tille
Re: Please use "Depends: lme4 (>= 1.1-10), Imports: Matrix (>= 1.2-3)" in pbkrtest since those packages have dashes in version string
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Re: Please use "Depends: lme4 (>= 1.1-10), Imports: Matrix (>= 1.2-3)" in pbkrtest since those packages have dashes in version string
Andreas Tille
Re: Please use "Imports: XML (>= 3.98-1.3)" since XML has dash in version string
Emmanuel Blondel (GMAIL)
Re: Please use "Imports: XML (>= 3.98-1.3)" since XML has dash in version string
Andreas Tille
Re: Fwd: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#900081: autopkgtest regressions in r-cran-(ritis|webmockr|worrms) will delay r-base-3.5 transition
Andreas Tille
Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#900083: Fwd: Bug#900081: autopkgtest regressions in r-cran-(ritis|webmockr|worrms) will delay r-base-3.5 transition
Graham Inggs
Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#900083: Fwd: Bug#900081: autopkgtest regressions in r-cran-(ritis|webmockr|worrms) will delay r-base-3.5 transition
Andreas Tille
More - vs . woes
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Re: More - vs . woes
Andreas Tille
Re: More - vs . woes
Charles Plessy
Re: More - vs . woes
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Re: More - vs . woes
Andreas Tille
Re: Accepted r-cran-rjson 0.2.20-1 (source) into unstable
Sébastien Villemot
Re: Accepted r-cran-rjson 0.2.20-1 (source) into unstable
Andreas Tille
Re: Accepted r-cran-rjson 0.2.20-1 (source) into unstable
Sébastien Villemot
Transition status
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Re: Transition status
Charles Plessy
Re: Transition status
Sébastien Villemot
Re: Transition status
Graham Inggs
Re: Transition status
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Re: Transition status
Sébastien Villemot
Re: Transition status
Andreas Tille
Re: Transition status
Sébastien Villemot
Re: Transition status
Andreas Tille
"Competing" R packging
Andreas Tille
Re: "Competing" R packging
Dirk Eddelbuettel
dh-r and pkg-r-autopkgtest
Andreas Tille
Re: dh-r and pkg-r-autopkgtest
Dylan Aïssi
Re: dh-r and pkg-r-autopkgtest
Andreas Tille
Re: dh-r and pkg-r-autopkgtest
Andreas Tille
dh-r lacks xvfb-run option
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Re: dh-r lacks xvfb-run option
Andreas Tille
Re: dh-r lacks xvfb-run option
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Re: dh-r lacks xvfb-run option
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Re: Bug#901625: dh-r has circular Depends on r-base-dev
Andreas Tille
Re: Bug#901625: dh-r has circular Depends on r-base-dev
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Re: Bug#901625: dh-r has circular Depends on r-base-dev
Andreas Tille
Re: Seeking valid e-mail address of r-cran-curl maintainer (Was: curl/7.60.0-1 appears to break r-cran-curl/3.2-1 autopkgtest in testing)
Jeroen Ooms
Re: curl/7.60.0-1 appears to break r-cran-curl/3.2-1 autopkgtest in testing
Andreas Tille
Re: curl/7.60.0-1 appears to break r-cran-curl/3.2-1 autopkgtest in testing
Jeroen Ooms
Re: curl/7.60.0-1 appears to break r-cran-curl/3.2-1 autopkgtest in testing
Andreas Tille
Re: curl/7.60.0-1 appears to break r-cran-curl/3.2-1 autopkgtest in testing
Jeroen Ooms
Re: curl/7.60.0-1 appears to break r-cran-curl/3.2-1 autopkgtest in testing
Andreas Tille
Re: curl/7.60.0-1 appears to break r-cran-curl/3.2-1 autopkgtest in testing
Jeroen Ooms
The last update was on 11:15 GMT Mon Jun 10. There are 120 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc