Re: Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)
On 01/06/18 11:44, Graham Inggs wrote:
> On 01/06/2018 10:09, Graham Inggs wrote:
>> On 1 June 2018 at 09:24, Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> wrote:
>>> Does anyone know why some packages, e.g. cluster, foreign, nlme and
>>> rmatrix appear different on the tracker [1]?
>>>
>>> Did they lose their dependency on r-api-3.4 somewhere along the line?
>>> Was this intentional?
>>> Do they also need to be rebuilt?
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/r-base-3.5.html
>>
>> I believe this is the cause of the build failures like this one in
>> r-cran-irlba [2].
>>
>>
>> Error: package or namespace load failed for 'Matrix':
>> package 'Matrix' was installed by an R version with different
>> internals; it needs to be reinstalled for use with this R version
>> Error : package 'Matrix' could not be loaded
>> ERROR: lazy loading failed for package 'irlba'
>>
>>
>> [2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=r-cran-irlba
>>
>
> I don't see anything wrong with these source packages, as simply rebuilding them
> is enough for the r-api-3.5 dependency to appear.
>
> Was there a bug in dh-r at the time these were uploaded?
>
> Anyway, I believe they do need to be rebuilt.
> Emilio, would you schedule these for binNMU as well please?
> Can you pick them up from the tracker, or would you prefer me to provide a list?
Scheduled for cluster foreign rmpi nlme rmatrix robustbase lmtest survival lme4
tseries.
Cheers,
Emilio
Reply to: